Moon landing is on Arizona land and a hoax✍
بالأدلة الدامغة امريكا وصلت لصحراء أريزونا وليس للقمر
NASA forgot to remove shadows and another moon 🌙 which makes them reach Mars before the moon 🌙 😉
🌓🇺🇸👨🚀The biggest hoax ever.
👊You are more developed now why can’t you go back!?
In this article you will be buried into your own tomb ok
The man was walking to the moon right? But still I see another moon.. that is wrong. with that picture.two moons!!??
Which moon is that in the background? It’s not possible to see the moon from the moon. It’s either they’re not on the moon or better still a photoshop lol
A shadow. the moon might give the shadow inline to the objects, however, shadows cited that the produced light came from other position
Proofs moon landing is a lie👇🏻
1- There are no stars in any of the photos; the Apollo 11 astronauts also stated in post-mission press conferences that they did not remember seeing any stars during EVA
Conspiracists contend that NASA chose not to put the stars into the photosbecause astronomers would have been able to use them to determine whether the photos were taken from the Earth or the Moon, by means of identifying them and comparing their celestial position and parallax to what would be expected for either observation site.
Plait 2002, pp. 165–67
2- The Moon’s surface during the daytime is so hot that camera film would have melted.
The flag placed on the surface by the astronauts fluttered despite there being no wind on the Moon. This suggests that it was filmed on Earth and a breeze caused the flag to flutter. Sibrel said that it may have been caused by indoor fans used to cool the astronauts since their spacesuit cooling systems would have been too heavy on Earth.
The flag was fastened to a Г-shaped rod (see Lunar Flag Assembly) so that it did not hang down. The flag only seemed to flutter when the astronauts were moving it into position. Without air drag, these movements caused the free corner of the flag to swing like a pendulum for some time. The flag was rippled because it had been folded during storage – the ripples could be mistaken for movement in a still photo. Videos show that when the astronauts let go of the flagpole it vibrates briefly but then remains still.
●Ref: Harrison 2012, p. 97
● Kaysing 2002, pp. 20, 21, 22, 23
3-Shadows were wrong
In images from the moon landing, it is possible to see certain objects even though they are in shadow. Skeptics argue that if the sun were the only source of light, this wouldn’t be the case. Therefore, the fact that you can see some objects in shadow must be the result of special Hollywood lighting.
The problem with this theory is that although the sun is the main source of illumination on the moon, it isn’t the onlysource of illumination. Another source is the lunar ground, which reflects the sun’s light. In the Apollo 11 pictures, “the sunlight is being scattered or reflected off the ground every which way, and some of it—a small fraction but enough to be able to see—scatters into the shadows,” Fienberg says.
This is why, in some images, you can make out a plaque that Armstrong and Aldrin left on the moon even though it’s lying in shadow.
The moon landing is fake because you can’t see Armstrong’s camera
In one of the pictures from the moon landing, you can see Armstrong clearly reflected in Aldrin’s visor. Some skeptics have pointed out that Armstrong does not appear to be holding a camera, so someone else must be taking the picture. But that isn’t true.
Armstrong couldn’t walk around the moon with a regular hand-held camera. In his bulky suit, he needed something that was easy to manipulate. The camera he used on the moon was mounted on the front of his suit, which is where his hands are in the reflection.
The moon landing is fake because Stanley Kubrick filmed it.
Director Stanley Kubrick’s film 2001: A Space Odyssey wowed audiences in 1968 for creating a realistic image of outer space. It was so compelling that some conspiracy theorists later wondered if the government had actually hired Kubrick to film the moon landing in a soundstage (possibly like the one James Bond ran through in the 1971 film Diamonds Are Forever).
The thing is, the moon landing footage didn’t look real because Kubrick filmed it—Kubrick’s movie 2001 looked real because Kubrick enlisted astronomical artists and aerospace engineers to help him with it. The only “evidence” that Kubrick filmed the moon landing has itself proved to be a hoax.
Denial of America’s great progress in space exploration and belief in these myths is “more of an ideological thing—a political thing—than it is a scientific thing,” Fienberg notes.
To those who know the moon landing was real, conspiracy theories that it was a hoax may seem silly and innocuous. But their consequences aren’t: they spread misinformation, make people susceptible to other false theories and could earn you a punch from Buzz Aldrin.
The Wildest Moon Landing Conspiracy Theories, Debunked
Claims the Apollo 11 mission was staged began soon after astronauts first set foot on the moon in 1969.
BBC : moon landing was fake
And a mere entertainment
The Van Allen belts are huge belts of radiation that surround the Earth. It’s been claimed that humans would not be able to pass through these belts without being subjected to lethal doses of radiation.
Radiation sickness occurs when you have been exposed to around 200 to 1000 ‘rads’ of radiation within a few hours.
Two giant swaths of radiation, known as the Van Allen Belts, surrounding Earth were discovered in 1958. In 2012, a third belt was found
The Apollo 11 crew were within the belts for less than two hours during their journey to the Moon, and so would have only been exposed to an estimated 18 rads – well within the safe limit.
Nasa made sure that the spacecraft was well-insulated so actually the average dose of radiation over the 12-day mission was just 0.18 rads – similar to a chest X-ray.
Some other witnesses from books too.. etc
Marcus Allen – British publisher of Nexus, who said photographs of the lander would not prove that the United States put men on the Moon, and “Getting to the Moon really isn’t much of a problem – the Russians did that in 1959. The big problem is getting people there.” He suggests that NASA sent robot missions because radiation levels in outer space would be deadly
Matthews, Robert (November 24, 2002). “World’s biggest telescope to prove Americans really walked on Moon”. The Sunday Telegraph. London: Telegraph Media Group. Retrieved May 15, 2013.
In 2012, images were released showing five of the six Apollo missions’ American flags erected on the Moonstill standing; the exception is that of Apollo 11, which has lain on the lunar surface since being accidentally blown over by the takeoff rocket’s exhaust.
^ “Apollo Moon flags still standing, images show”. BBC News. London: BBC. July 30, 2012. Retrieved April 29, 2013.
Abbey, Jennifer (July 31, 2012). “American Flags From Apollo Missions Still Standing”. ABC News (Blog). New York: ABC. Retrieved April 29, 2013
Even as late as 2001, the Fox television network documentary Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?claimed NASA faked the first landing in 1969 to win the Space Race.
Phillips, Tony (February 23, 2001). “The Great Moon Hoax”. Science@NASA. NASA. Retrieved July 30, 2012
James H. Fetzer – American conspiracy theorist and retired philosophy professor. On May 2, 2013, Dr. Fetzer was interviewed by Dr. Sterling Harwood. Fetzer defended his conspiracist views that all six lunar landings were hoaxes.
 Fetzer, James H. (May 2, 2013). “Did America Land Men on the Moon?: The Moon Landing Hoax”. Spirit To Spirit
COMPILED BY Ridouan Soumaa
PLEASE SHARE ABUNDANTLY JAZAKUMU ALLAHU KHAYRAN